Friday, March 23, 2012

Two Dark Comedies, Two Distinctly Different Reviews: Carnage and Young Adult

Dark comedy, or black comedy, is often something you get or you don't.  It's a strange breed of comdy, and is often synonymous with the idea of laughing at someone else's pain (despite them knowing it or not).  It would be fare to say that it is a difficult genre to pull off for movie makers.  It's easy to go over the line of cynicism.

This brings me to Carnage and Young Adult.

Carnage - R

Carnage is Roman Polanski's latest film (Rosemary's Baby, The Pianist) and was released in the United States in December of 2011.  Clearly the timing of the film alludes to Oscar hopes, which was not realized.

The story centers around two sets of parents trying to come to an agreement about a fight their children got into in the park.  They settle into a Brooklyn apartment and try to figure out how the children should apologize.  Early on, the parents are putting on heirs of political correctness and patting themselves on the back for being so civilized about the whole matter.

Carnage
Penelope and Michael Longstreet (Jodie Foster, John C. Reilly) are the parents of Ethan, who was struck in the face with a stick by Zachary in the park over a dispute that would probably only make sense to fellow eleven year olds. Nancy and Alan Cowan (Kate Winslet, Christopher Waltz) have differing opinions on their son, Zachary, and his actions. The two sets of parents try to be polite to each other, but eventually the parents begin to crack.

Alan Cowan (Waltz) is constantly being interrupted by his cell phone, which he is happy to oblige much to his wife's chagrin.  Nancy tries to compliment her hosts apartment with insincere appreciation, and is often referred to as fake behind her back.

Penelope Longstreet is an uptight woman who has lost her sense of humor and has focused her energy on trying to convince everyone of her interest in the suffering around the world -- namely in Darfur.  Her husband, Michael, is a door to door salesman and in the beginning attempts to diffuse any rattling of contempt. He seems the laid back guy, and wants everyone to just get along.

By the end of the movie everyone has come undone, and all their personal problems are bubbling to the surface.  The problem at hand, the boys fight, ends up in the background and the parent's struggles take center stage.  In what could only be accomplished by talented actors, which this movie definitely has, the film captures something very real about our society and how we view ourselves as people.

The film also has a constant theme of entrapment.  The room in which the movie takes place is small (though the apartment is beyond a door to door salesman's pay range) and at times you feel the walls are closing in.  The characters feel trapped in their lives and the living room in which the film takes places captures this feeling for the audience.  Through the windows of the apartment we can see a hustling and bustling world go by while these four characters are stuck in this place at this moment.  The conversation isn't going anywhere, but the rest of the world is.  I think the idea of this captures the fact of how trivial there conversation becomes, but is expertly executed in an intelligent way.

The film is beautifully directed by Polanski and is well acted by all four actors.  The second half of the film shines brighter than the first half.  The hilarity of the film is in its absurdity of life. "What does it all mean" seems to be a recurrent theme in this film.  Bottom line, this film speaks of very real sentiments we can all relate to in some existential way.

Grade: A-


Young Adult- R


Young Adult is a 2011 Jason Reitman film (Juno, Up in the Air), written by Diablo Cody (Juno).  The film was critically acclaimed for its dark humor and was included in many lists as one of the best movies of the year (2011).

The film centers around Mavis Gary (Charlize Theron), a ghost writer for a once popular young adult series of books.  She lives in Minneapolis, or the mini-apple as it commonly referred to in this movie.  In the beginning of the movie Mavis receives an e-mail from a former boyfriend announcing the birth of his daughter.  She prints out the picture and begins obsessing over it.

After a one night stand, Mavis packs a suitcase, her dog, and jumps in the car to head back to her hometown on a mission -- to regain the boyfriend she feels is hers.  She is clearly a mess but to what degree is still to be decided in the middle of the movie.

Charlize Theron as Mavis Gary
She immediately heads to the local bar and runs into a former classmate who she doesn't recall. Her arrogant attitude toward disabled Matt (Patton Oswalt) is jarring at times.  She comes to remember him as the "hate crime kid." He was assalted by the jocks of the school who thought he was gay.  He is permanently disabled by the incident.  She later recalls it as a scuffle and tells him to get over it.

She reveals to Matt (in a drunken state) that she is in town to win back her former beau, Buddy Slade (Patrick Wilson).  Matt calls her crazy and relates that Buddy is a happily married man by all accounts.  She brushes this off and makes a catch-up-date with Buddy for the following evening.

Buddy seems a sincere, loving family guy and oblivious to her all too obvious affections for him.  He asks her to meet up with him again, which she jumps at the chance for, depsite the invitation being to see his wife's band play at the local bar.  She arrives to the gig and casts dirty looks on anyone who looks in her direction.  Mavis ends up giving Buddy a lift home because his wife wants to stay out at the bar later than the babysitter is able to stay (sure, I can see why a woman would have a beautiful ex-girlfriend take her drunk husband home).  Mavis steals a kiss before the babysitter so rudely interrupts!

Depsite the obvious signs that Mavis is up to no good -- and a forbidden kiss -- she is invited to Buddys daughter's naming ceremony. Mavis hates children but happily obliges. in order to be near Buddy.  The event turns out to be a disaster and Mavis' real motives come out in a bullets blazing way.  Buddy's wife reveals she is the one who invited Mavis to the party because she felt sorry for her, despite her husbands objections (yeah, because that sounds like a good reason to destroy an important moment for your family).  Mavis' mental illness is more than obvious by this point.  She flees to her friend/non-friend Matt's for consoling and more.

In the end,we are essentially where we began. Mavis is great and everybody else has the problem.

The film is not funny, first and foremost.  It is disturbing, narcissistic, and cringeworthy at times.  Mavis is clearly mentally unstable and her actions are abhorrent. Charlize Theron does a great job of portraying the train wreck of Mavis, but I question why you would want to portray her to begin with.  There is nothing likeable about the character, and life in small town (which it's not that small) is portrayed as worthless, backward, and a demeaning way to live.  The resolution -- I suppose everyone goes back to their boring, mediocre life while Mavis moves on to bigger and better things. At least that is what the film makers would like to convey.

It was a horrible movie, and hardly black comedy.  If anything, it was a tragedy minus the fact that she never had to pay for her hubris.  I found myself more than once mentally hitting the imaginary break in the passenger side of the car. If you want to feel uncomfortable and cringe, see this movie. If you find this funny, that may actually say something about you.

Grade: D-


I welcome your thoughts on these two films. Leave me a comment!



Monday, March 19, 2012

The Walking Dead


ATTENTION: Potential Spoiler Alert


The second season of The Walking Dead has wrapped and what an ending to a season it was.  From the first moments of the episode you were captivated by the intensity of the episode.  It maintained that level throughout the rest of the show, as well, which I often think is lacking on the show.  They can't all be blood, guts, and screams, of course.

Copyright belongs to AMC
AMC has a real winner on their hands with this show, and hopefully more people will give it a chance.  The season finale had the highest ratings for The Walking Dead thus far with 9 million viewers, which is fantastic. I have to admit, though, that I wasn't crazy about the show in the first season.  I thought there were elements that were really interesting, but I felt it moved too slowly.

I love the fact that while they are dealing with zombies, the show is more about the people and re-learning how to live in a world that no longer is meant for them. The premise is not necessarily anything new, but it is being executed really well.   The second season was ten times better than the first, even though it moved slowly at times.

I was disappointed in the fact that they killed off the character Shane in the second to last episode.  I really liked his character because he balanced out the group.  The good cop bad cop thing worked really well. That being said, I was disappointed early in the season with the direction they were taking his character.  If became obvious that his character wouldn't be able to stay because they were making him more and more maniacal.  I know that he lasted longer in the series than he did in the comics (which I have not read), but I still liked the tension he added to the show.

In the most recent episode (season finale), there was one thing that I didn't understand.  Why the heck was Lori so pissed that Rick killed Shane? She so much as told Rick he was dangerous and he needed to "dea" with him a few episodes ago.  Then in the episode where Shane is killed, she talks to Shane and apologizes. Hunh? I don't get what they were trying to accomplish here.  Is she feeling bad because she came between the two men? Or is her character just poorly written? Maybe all of the above.

Carl needs a nanny. End of thought.

Andrea's character has really grown this season.  I didn't care for her at all until the last few episodes of the second season. Since Dale's death, her character seems to have really hit her stride.  As for the rest of the characters. T-dog is so superfluous that there isn't much that can be said.  Maggie and Glen still don't seem like a couple to me. They just don't work, IMO, but I guess there aren't a lot of options (if you were the last man on Earth...)!  Hershel is a great character, Carol has already served her purppse, Rick has good points and bad, and Darryl is by far the best character on the show.  Who are the other characters? Oh, that's right, the writers don't really care, either.


The end of the episode was interesting, and clearly is being talked about a lot.  Andrea who was left behind was rescued by the comic fan favorite character, Michonne.  It should be interesting to see how they utilize her next season. Will she be the favorite in the T.V. series, as well? As for me, I will be tuning in.

Who do you think will be killed off next in season 3?  Any predictions about next season?  Any thoughts on this season?


 A. Lewis

The Lemmings of Corporate America

    What used to be a simple task of purchasing an item in a store has become quite the ordeal these days.  This idea extends beyond the cashiers counter -- calling customer service, ordering an item over the phone, or inquiring about a service.  Essentially, customer service in this country has become an otherworldly experience. Why do I say this you may ask. It seems that Corporate America has decided how "special" our shopping experience should be every time we make that AMAZING purchase. Who is to blame here? I'm not sure this is easily answered.  I often feel bad for the person who is relating the nonsense in order to keep their job.  Who is winning here? I am irritated, and the employee is reticent to look like the fool who has to offer me the same credit card five times.  Let me give you some recent experiences...

  I walk up to the counter at Sears...
Sears Drone: (chipper!) Hello and welcome to Sears.
Me: (annoyed) Hi.
Sears: What a lovely pair of shoes! Is this going to be all today?
Me: Um, yeah. It's all I brought to you isn't it? (Ok, so maybe that last part I just thought to myself)
Sears: Can I get your phone number, please?
Me: Uhhh, sure.
Sears: Can I get an email address?
Me: Blah blah blah
Sears: Can we sign you up for our email promotions?
Me: Hunh?
Sears: Your zip code?
Me: really?
Sears: Would you like to sign up for our rewards program?
Me: No.
Sears: Are you sure, you can save money on purchases!
Me: No.
Sears: Would you like to apply for the Sears card today?
Me: No.
Sears: Would like to apply for Sears Visa card today?
Me: Still no.
Sears: Can I have your blood type?
Me: Hunh?

  Okay, maybe that last comment didn't actually happen, but sadly the rest did.  I wish I was making this up. I just wanted to buy a $10.00 pair of kids shoes! It floored me. I walked away scratching my head and wondering what had just happened.  Who in the hell decided this would be advantageous for the company?

  A friend recently walked into a jewelry store to browse around.  Seems harmless enough.  After the initial contact of "can I help you" and the typical response "no, just looking" was out of the way it got weird.  Said friend is married.  The sales person proceeds to ask my friend if she would be interested in trying on an engagement ring? Friend looks confused, "umm, I'm already married. I'm not really in the market for one nor would I buy myself one anyway."  Sales person begins to panic and leans in close across the counter.  She meekly smiles and whispers to my friend, "they have me on camera. I have to get every customer to try on a ring or I lose points, please."  Poor girl. Big brother is watching!!!! So, friend tries on the ring and leaves without any desire to return for that amazing engagement ring. I can't understand why she didn't go back, weird.

  These are two examples of the fine ways corporate giants have decided is the best way to sell items these days.  I can't even fathom what this means about the society that we are living in.  What ever happened to friendly service, exchange cash, and leave with desired item?  Maybe this is why people are on anti-depressants more than ever.  Your constantly fed BS at your job and can never keep up with the expectations, which are contrived to begin with, and are forced to act insincere or face losing your job.  This doesn't just apply to retail work, either.  Every company has buzz words and guide lines, and some form of this in it.  To what degree this exists in every job is up for debate.  Not only are we no longer allowed to think for ourselves, you are forced to be someone you're not and love it!  Maybe I'm cynical, but I don't ever consider a shopping trip an experience (though I have been asked about how great my shopping experience was! Woohoo!).  Shopping is not an experience, looking into my child's eyes for the first time is an experience, and I refuse to use the same word for both.

  I welcome your thoughts or personal encounters with this sort of thing.


A. Lewis